Contrapunto
Feb. 4th, 2009 02:54 amOver on
fanficrants there's a debate going on about self-inserts.
I just got a call from
flederkatz who was betaing my self-insert's origin story, where she said that this character is way more alien than my others, carefully constructed characters.
Have to go back to my space ship now and work on my disguise.
I just got a call from
Have to go back to my space ship now and work on my disguise.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-04 05:24 pm (UTC)Which isn't to say I've never come up with Mary Sues, but my Mary Sues are not self-inserts in any way, shape or form.
I really wish R&D would come up with better disguises, you know. These ones just don't stand up to prolonged scrutinity.
And I may have to go play in that post now - I'd not looked into it in a while :)
(no subject)
Date: 2009-02-05 12:25 am (UTC)Over time (especially since she got her own 'verse) she has grown into being her own character, but whenever I write her first-person, the second most common comment from my betas (after "This is a five-line run-on sentence. Periods are your friends!") is, "that is so you". Which is OK because my betas love me anyways. Anyone else, unless I specifically told them, would not know it was me -- her 'verse is different, her life is different, unless a reader knows me well there is just no place of connection. Which takes care of the privacy issues.
And with "insane", I think that a lot of this gets pared down by the needs of the story. To make it readable fiction, I have to cut out some of my stranger and less productive habits (like the tendency to hold long improptu lectures about obscure topics, overthink stuff for pages, or obsessive counting), so what remains is just the right degree of strange.
I really wish R&D would come up with better disguises, you know.
My AI explained that there are regulations against making the psychological masking stronger, because fitting in too well might cause the researchers to "go native".
Stupid regulations.